Healthy and wealthy gain from non-contestability

clock

Introducing a non-contestability period into life and critical illness insurance policies will encourage preferred life underwriting and favour the healthy and wealthy, says Jon Briggs, protection research manager at Hargreaves Lansdown.

The comments follow a presentation given by RGA UK in December, where Jason Hurley, head of sales and marketing, said a non-contestability period would cause insurers to be more “fussy” about who they give cover to and move towards preferred life policies. Briggs agrees a non-contestability clause will strengthen the argument for the arrival of preferred life underwriting in the UK, saying it is the “natural course to take and pretty much inevitable”. In the US, insurers have a two-year non-contestability period after which they cannot throw out a valid claim on any basis other than fra...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Protection

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Rising demand for IHT planning

Cameron Roberts
clock 25 August 2026 • 2 min read
Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

What represents true value for the client?

Alan Lakey
clock 11 August 2026 • 3 min read
Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Three assumptions keeping the protection gap alive

Graham Singleton
clock 28 July 2026 • 5 min read