L&G cuts non-disclosure claims rate in 2007

clock

The number of critical illness claims (CIC) rejected by Legal & General (L&G) for non-disclosure last year has dropped from 2006, it announced today.

The firm turned down a total of 7.7% of claims in 2007, a fall of 36% from the previous year. It says it paid more than £110m, at an average £60,000 each, in CIC last year, up from £92.1m in 2006 - a total of 88.2% of all claims made. In addition, L&G says CIC claims were primarily for cancer, terminal illness, heart attack, stroke and multiple sclerosis. A total of £179m was also paid on life insurance claims, representing 96.3% of claims received. Bernie Hickman, managing director of protection at L&G, says: “This is further evidence of our progress in bringing down the level of dec...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Protection

The protection gap is not a surprise - treating it as one is

The protection gap is not a surprise - treating it as one is

'This is not mysterious. It is what this market is built to produce'

Tony Müdd
clock 09 September 2026 • 4 min read
Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Rising demand for IHT planning

Cameron Roberts
clock 25 August 2026 • 2 min read
Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

What represents true value for the client?

Alan Lakey
clock 11 August 2026 • 3 min read