LEGAL & GENERAL exployed an eminent psychology professor yesterday to dispute the survey of "mis-sold" endowment customers conducted by the FSA, says this morning's Times .
In the latest round of the legal battle between the FSA and L&G over a £1m fine for alleged endowment mis-selling, memory expert David Shanks of University College London argued on behalf of L&G the chances of most of the insurer’s customers – within in a key sample - remembering events accurately and without distortion was “very low indeed”. Professor Shanks told the FSA tribunal there was little likelihood of customers accurately remembering sales interviews that took place three to five years earlier, and are more likely to have introduced unintentional biases. His criticism of the...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes