Protection too expensive - consumers

clock

Half of consumers without protection cover say policies are too expensive, research suggests.

According to a study by Zurich, 47% of 2,000 people surveyed cite affordability as a reason for not taking out additional insurance policies. Only 33% say they are willing to reduce their monthly outgoings to fund mortgage or family protection, Zurich says. Additionally, three in ten respondents argue cover isn't necessary as they do not have any dependants while over a fifth (22%) of those surveyed have no form of mortgage protection. "Most people are happy to insure their house and its contents, their car, their cat, their travel plans or their mobile phone, but they often give litt...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Protection

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Rising demand for IHT planning

Cameron Roberts
clock 25 August 2026 • 2 min read
Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

What represents true value for the client?

Alan Lakey
clock 11 August 2026 • 3 min read
Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Three assumptions keeping the protection gap alive

Graham Singleton
clock 28 July 2026 • 5 min read