When it comes to FSCS levies, it's time to have our voices heard

'This is no time to sit on the sidelines and wait for a good result'

clock • 5 min read

John Netting shares his opinion on the FSCS 'polluter pays' consultation and urges those with an interest in the outcome to get involved in the process now...

Last November the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced a consultation on capital deduction for redress which in essence proposed the principle of ‘polluter pays' regarding the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) compensating investors claiming against poorly-run or fraudulent advisory firms. Well done to the regulator for attempting to tackle this perennial problem that besets well-managed advice businesses, who for far too long have been obliged to stump up increasing FSCS levies owing to the claims of investors badly let down by poor advice practices. But it's a con...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA 'consistently behind the curve' on British Steel – Complaints Commissioner

FCA 'consistently behind the curve' on British Steel – Complaints Commissioner

Regulator hits back at Complaints Commissioner’s final report

Jenna Brown
clock 26 March 2026 • 3 min read
FSCS unveils five-year strategy

FSCS unveils five-year strategy

Three core focus areas

Jen Frost
clock 26 March 2026 • 2 min read
AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

'It's not enough for the AR to hold its own cover. The obligation sits with the principal'

Jonathan Newell
clock 24 March 2026 • 8 min read