"A crude approach" and "blunt instrument" were just two of the verdicts delivered on Legal & General's recent pilot study on postcode annuities. The argument is that such a broad brush approach cannot take full account of the diversity of people living in any one area and that more notice needs to be taken of the lifestyle factors affecting why some people live longer than others. Some say the concept simply isn't fair with the results skewed in favour of those who are living in areas where statistics say longevity is lower with no regard to the individual's health or lifestyle. So for ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes




