HMRC loses husband-and-wife settlements case

Laura Miller
clock •

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has lost a claim against a couple for £20,000 in back taxes.

The Revenue claimed tax was due on dividends paid as part of a settlement under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. However, in a decision published this month, the First-Tier tribunal found in favour of the couple. Tribunal judge Barbara Mosedale concluded an arrangement under which David Patmore paid his wife dividends on non-voting B shares in their company did not fulfil the criteria for an s660a settlement. In the late 1990s, Mr and Mrs Patmore paid £320,000 to buy the small manufacturing company for which Mr Patmore worked. The husband and wife jointly funded a sha...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

US midterms: What history tells us about what comes next

US midterms: What history tells us about what comes next

Expect a post-election pop

Dan Lefkovitz
clock 10 November 2026 • 4 min read
Watch PA's Working Lunch with Baillie Gifford - The future of growth investing

Watch PA's Working Lunch with Baillie Gifford - The future of growth investing

Catch up on the discussion

Professional Adviser
clock 03 November 2026 • 1 min read
Brits better at spotting horror movie warning signs than investment red flags

Brits better at spotting horror movie warning signs than investment red flags

FCA findings

Sophia Panayi
clock 02 November 2026 • 2 min read