HMRC loses husband-and-wife settlements case

Laura Miller
clock

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has lost a claim against a couple for £20,000 in back taxes.

The Revenue claimed tax was due on dividends paid as part of a settlement under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. However, in a decision published this month, the First-Tier tribunal found in favour of the couple. Tribunal judge Barbara Mosedale concluded an arrangement under which David Patmore paid his wife dividends on non-voting B shares in their company did not fulfil the criteria for an s660a settlement. In the late 1990s, Mr and Mrs Patmore paid £320,000 to buy the small manufacturing company for which Mr Patmore worked. The husband and wife jointly funded a sha...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

How quality investing behaves through the cycle

How quality investing behaves through the cycle

Resilience when it matters more

Joseph Stephens and Laura Neill
clock 14 September 2026 • 4 min read
Why portfolios need to evolve, not revolve when it comes to client outcomes

Why portfolios need to evolve, not revolve when it comes to client outcomes

'As market structures evolve, so must portfolio construction'

Ed Senior
clock 11 September 2026 • 4 min read
What does 'quality' investing actually mean?

What does 'quality' investing actually mean?

Why persistence is the real test

Joseph Stephens and Laura Neill
clock 11 September 2026 • 4 min read