In a 47 page report, the DWP denies claims put forward by Ann Abraham, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, that it was guilty of three instances of maladministration, two regarding information provided to consumers and trustees, and the third over its decision to alter the Minimum Funding Requirement (MFR) in 2002.
Responding to the charges, the report claims the government cannot accept any responsibility for information provided by the DWP as it was the “fundamental responsibility of trustees and employers to provide detailed information on their schemes to their scheme members.” It adds: ”These were not the Government’s pension schemes. Their trustees were not the Government’s trustees. The Government did ensure - through Occupational Pension Regulatory Authority (Opra) guides and actuarial certificates - trustees were guided towards the information they needed. The other more general information ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
Signup and gain exclusive members-only insights
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes
