Some SIPP providers are failing investors by flooding the specialist products with their own funds - rendering them little more than insured personal pensions.
That is the view of UK SIPP provider James Hay, which says using the SIPP in this way can be “restrictive” and “certainly does not make the best use of a SIPP product”. The firm, wholly owned by Abbey, says analysis of the Pensions Management SIPP Survey shows a trio of major providers with over 70% of SIPP assets held with in-house insured funds. It says this suggests these firms are using SIPP structures to sell in lucrative internally-managed funds business, and that these SIPPs are little more than insured personal pensions. Chris Smeaton, propositions and e-commerce manager at James...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes