The Income Protection Task Force did not anticipate such resistance to its advice, but, as Peter Le Beau explains, the team is still struggling to resuscitate the beleaguered product.
When the Income Protection Task Force was launched, none of its founders realised how challenging it would be to develop a much more positive profile for income protection (IP). But while some of the problems were anticipated, others were not. It came as no surprise that IP was perceived as a complex and heavily underwritten product, or that people do not seem to appreciate the need for it, despite the fact that it protects their income against continuing ill-health. It was also not unexpected that advisers find it much easier to sell lump sums rather than the promise of a protected perce...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes





