Funds that adopted a value approach and took more defensive positions minimised their losses over the past three years
Over the past three years, the division between the winners and losers in the European equity arena has been straightforward: who prepared best for the bear? Although the situation has now changed, the three-year figures are overwhelmingly determined by what happened in 2000 and 2001. Funds that took a value approach and adopted a defensive position minimised their losses, while those using growth strategies and invested in TMT have not had time to recover and so they are still languishing at the bottom of the league tables. The Fidelity Funds European Growth Fund has performed wel...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes