The Gaines-Cooper case has been a catalyst for a much needed statutory residence test to bring clarity and certainty to an area governed largely by case law and HMRC guidance, says Stuart Long, head of tax at law firm Howard Kennedy.
After a thirteen-year long residency dispute between Seychelles-based British millionaire Robert Gaines-Cooper and HMRC, the Supreme Court has found in favour of the taxman. The case concerned the interpretation of HMRC's now defunct IR20 guidance on when an individual becomes non-resident and not ordinarily resident in the UK. Gaines-Cooper, who migrated to the Seychelles in 1976, argued IR20 contained a more benevolent interpretation of those circumstances than was reflected in the ordinary law, and, as such, a legitimate expectation arose that this interpretation would be applied b...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes