Most companies are unaware closing a defined benefits (DB)pension scheme is not enough to avoid a Pensions Protection Fund (PPF) levy, warns First Actuarial.
The PPF levy was introduced just six months ago, but has already come under criticism for causing final salary schemes to close. But First Actuarial suggests this won’t actually help a company’s cash flow, as it will still have to pay the “insurance premium” of a PPF levy while covering the costs of setting up and contributing to a new pension scheme. Alan Smith, director of First Actuarial says: “It doesn’t seem to have sunk in with most people that just closing a DB scheme won’t stop the levy. If the company goes into liquidation and there’s not enough money to pay the benefits promise...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes