In the wake of both CP 121 and Sandler, the spotlight has clearly been focused on remuneration and t...
In the wake of both CP 121 and Sandler, the spotlight has clearly been focused on remuneration and the perceived conflict of interest if an adviser receives commission. Sandler has even questioned whether an adviser should be called an adviser if the costs are funded by a third party, rather than directly by their client. While some observers have denounced the recent proposals as lacking evidential justification, and even naive, most people would agree the current questionmark over the impartiality and objectivity of advisers must be answered if the sector is to survive and flourish. O...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes