"Better than best" rules should be replaced by "no worse than" regulation if adviser status and pola...
"Better than best" rules should be replaced by "no worse than" regulation if adviser status and polarisation are changed, says the Investment and Life Assurance Group. According to ILAG's response to CP121, this would ensure advisers owned by life offices are not unfairly influenced and that they still recommend the best products available to the consumer. It is inevitable that providers will try to influence intermediaries in which they have a stake, if proposals to introduce authorized financial advisers, or multi-ties, go ahead because providers will be investing "not only for th...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes