Not a single absolute return fund met its investment objectives in 2006, research shows.
The survey by Standard and Poor’s Fund Services also suggests most funds failed to even match the performance of cash. None of the funds surveyed were able to meet their own investment objectives, usually at least 100bp over Libor before fees. S&P put much of the underperformance down to a difficult year for fixed-income investment. But Kate Hollis, lead analyst at Standard & Poors, highlights other reasons for poor performance. "A number of funds also had reasonably high exposures to emerging market debt and these were caught by the emerging debt wobble in Q2 of 06," she says. Hollis ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes