As the weeks go by so the debate about the adviser model goes on. In particular, the debate about indemnity vs renewable remuneration is causing a lot of chatter.
There are arguments on both sides although there does appear to be a ‘fees good, commission bad’ feel to a lot of commentary. Perhaps that is a reflection of the way many see the industry going. There is the call though from some suggesting clients will not pay fees, or that fees are only acceptable to those with above average earnings or financial means. And then we have the issue of indemnity commission being the bane of the industry, with accusations that it drives churning. But the argument goes that some indemnity commission is needed to reflect the upfront expense of new business. T...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes