The debate between insurers and their ‘right' to assess risk against public policy concerns about unethical discrimination has come into sharp focus again with the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) ruling on gender discrimination.
These debates always take place on two levels. Firstly, on a technical risk assessment one, on whether insurers can prove that any particular group of people is at greater risk than another. Secondly, on an ethical one, as to whether it is acceptable to discriminate against a particular group per se. Consensus is easy at each end of the spectrum – discrimination against smoking is fine, on race it is not. Between these two extremes, things are resolved by some form of accommodation between the two, as happened in the UK on genetic tests. Prior to the ECJ’s ruling, it seemed that this was...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes