The number of advisers who give "independent" and "whole-of-market" advice is not relevant to measuring the success of depolarisation while the categories themselves are not very different, claims the Financial Services Authority (FSA)
Robin Gordon-Walker, press officer at the FSA, says the City watchdog is not monitoring which firms decide to offer independent advice and which decide to offer whole-of-market advice because the regulatory body believes there is not much difference between them. “We basically treat them all as financial advisers,” he says. Gordon-Walker claims whole-of-market and independent advisers are very similar because they share the common factor of not being tied, as opposed to single-tied and multi-tied advisers. FSA rules post-depolarisation state “independent” advisers must meet the FSA’...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes