I am not going to bore you with my applause for the FSA's recent RDR proposals; anything that moves us away from the current system is going to get my vote, especially if it forces investors to ditch their myopia on commission-based fees and ‘encourages' them to actually pay up front for decent professional advice.
My worry is the nirvana conceptualised by the FSA policy wonks may not actually happen – that wonderful new world might look like a British version of the US system where fees are driven down by careful, unbiased planners paid on a fees basis. The FSA has quite rightly focussed on the cost of advice alongside the distribution channels because of course although returns are possible, even probable, costs are a dead certainty that drains total shareholder returns. Yet I think the proposals may actually produce the exact opposite result on costs imagined by the FSA – they may start to rise ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes