SJP waives exit charge and pays out after causing 'upset' to former client

£200 in compensation

Hannah Godfrey
clock • 2 min read

St James's Place (SJP) has been asked to pay a former client £200 in redress after "trouble and upset" the advice firm caused her when she decided to pull her investments from the organisation.

SJP allocated a new partner to look after Ms H's investments without giving her any notice. Ms H was unhappy with this, and decided to move her investments away from the business. SJP then took "some time" to send cost information to her new adviser. SJP said it refunded some of its fees in response to Ms H's concerns about the change in partner. It also waived its early withdrawal fees so she could move her investments without charge. The firm also said it would send a gift to Ms H following the delay in sending information to her new adviser. A first FOS investigator thought SJP'...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FSCS declares IFA Ltd and AXG Advice in default

FSCS declares IFA Ltd and AXG Advice in default

Leeds and London advice firms face claims

Isabel Baxter
clock 06 May 2025 • 2 min read
FOS complaints rise 49% as investment disputes surge

FOS complaints rise 49% as investment disputes surge

Over 140,000 cases were lodged in H2 2024

Sahar Nazir
clock 06 May 2025 • 2 min read
Dennis Hall's open letter to the FCA: Time to retire RU64

Dennis Hall's open letter to the FCA: Time to retire RU64

'The rule is particularly misaligned with client expectations'

Dennis Hall
clock 01 May 2025 • 2 min read