"When I write to clients, I'm really writing to the Ombudsman." So said one adviser this week during a conversation about client relationships.
He said that, despite perfectly down-to-earth meetings with clients, during which he will not mention risk scales or say “markets can go down as well as up”, his follow-up letters read like they were written “by a robot”. This is because, he said, the next person to read them may be an Ombudsman or member of the FSA’s treating customers fairly team. And he doesn’t want to give them any free ammunition. It was in 2007 that the FSA said ‘suitability letters’ should be called ‘suitability reports’ and changed its requirement to a less prescriptive, more principles-based approach. But ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes