Head-to-head: Should RDR be delayed?

clock

One says 'yes', the other 'no': Financial Escape's Phil Castle and Old Mill's Simon Cole debate the call for a one-year delay to RDR.

YES Phil Castle (pictured) Director, Financial Escape “Absolutely. I achieved Level 4 last week, but a delay is necessary. We need to bear in mind the FSA has not issued the platform paper or details of the simplified advice regime yet. Once these are in the public domain, there needs to be a reasonable timescale for advisers to take action. “It is possible to reach Level 4 quite quickly but why should anyone do it when they don’t actually know what the rules are yet? “The RDR should never have included a cliff-edge date. Instead, the regulator should have let firms achieve on...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

Tim Sargisson
clock 13 January 2016 • 3 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •