What Lehman's fall tells us about transparency

clock

The obvious place to begin this blog is with the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Leaving aside the wider ramifications - I am not in a position to discuss those - the fall of Lehmans has done two things.

One, it has left many investors potentially nursing large capital losses and, two, it has highlighted - in the worst possible way - the dangers of counterparty risk. The IMA, whose statement prior to Lehman's collapse now seems particularly prescient, has won plaudits for flagging the latter issue, and no doubt it had a valid point with respect to transparency: providers have, on the whole, failed dismally to tackle accusations of opacity. Clearly, the widely accepted practice of simply stating “assets provided by an issuer rated A by Standard and Poors” in marketing literature has to sto...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

Partner Insight: Beyond 60/40

Partner Insight: Beyond 60/40

Invesco
clock 25 March 2024 • 5 min read
'Fundamental shift': Why transparent investing really matters

'Fundamental shift': Why transparent investing really matters

‘There needs to be a concerted shift towards greater openness’

Simon Camilleri
clock 18 March 2024 • 4 min read
Partner Insight: Passive and active — the case for both

Partner Insight: Passive and active — the case for both

Invesco
clock 18 March 2024 • 4 min read