Thousands of UK companies will put more effort into improving their credit rating to reduce their Pension Protection Fund levies, than they will into dealing with pension scheme deficits, suggests research from Aon Consulting.
Research suggests companies are focusing on reducing their PPF levies as it can be done quickly and at whereas while dealing with a pension deficit is a much heavier financial burden, and in some cases has little or no effect on the levy a pension scheme can expect to pay. For example, if a company’s credit rating is 'risk band two', with a pension deficit of £140m, the estimated total levy for 2006/7 will be £850,000, according to the study, however, if it reduces its deficit by £20m to £120m, but stays in the same risk band, its levy will be reduced just 12% to £748,000. However, if th...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes