The decision to measure pension deficits under Financial Reporting Standard 17 could be driving companies and trustees into a more conservative investment strategy which could prove costly in the long term, claims the Association of British Insurers.
In its latest research report: ‘Understanding Companies’ Pension Deficits’ the ABI points out although FRS17 – which requires companies to disclose pension liabilities on balance sheets – was introduced as a way to reduce subjectivity in the valuation of pension assets and liabilities, there is “ample room for improvement”. The 52-page document warns the problem with “balance sheet disclosure in general and FRS17 in particular” is that the information is condensed into a single number on a standardised basis, and they provide a “static” picture of a scheme at a given point in time, but fa...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes