The cost of guarantees on variable annuity products should be kept at 1% or less of the fund value per annum for consumers to be willing to pay for them, according to three-quarters of attendees at a recent Watson Wyatt debate.
The majority of the audience of senior financial services executives (57%) at the Watson Wyatt Debating Forum were in favour of the main motion that "this house believes that variable annuities provide peace of mind at a fair price".
Asked what sort of percentage of fund per year they thought consumers would be prepared to pay for guarantees for minimum income, 74% said 1% or less per year. Meanwhile 8% said over 1.5% would be acceptable.
Some 67% of the audience said variable annuities were suitable for at least 10% of consumers; with 47% suggesting between 10 and 25%.
The audience were also asked if they thought consumers were driven by price when buying security for retirement products. Here there was a near even split, with 47% saying price was not a driver and 45% taking the opposing view.
Colette Dunn, head of the insurance & financial services strategy group at Watson Wyatt, says: "What we saw was a strongly polarised debate. While a majority of the audience believe variable annuities to be a valuable product for consumers, over 40 per cent are yet to be convinced."IFAonline
Less environment, more governance threatens to undermine firms' green credentials
Evidence your compliance
Quarter of single pensioners dependent on state