The claim that multi-managers can consistently add value through active asset allocation and market timing may be a debatable one, says investment research manager at OBSR Gill Hutchison, but it is important to understand how providers use such techniques when determining whether their funds are appropriate for clients
In our research and analysis of multi-manager funds, we have found that there are broadly three different approaches to asset allocation - fixed asset allocation, relative return bias; active asset allocation, relative return bias; and active asset allocation, absolute return bias. These categorisations help to distinguish between those managers who believe it is not possible to add value consistently from active asset allocation and market timing, those who believe they are able to add value from taking strategic or tactical asset allocation positions within a relative return framework a...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes