• Home
  • Multi-Asset
  •  
    Retirement
    • Pensions
    • Income
    • Investment
    • Regulation
    • Estate planning
    • Equity release
  •  
    Your profession
    • Adviser tips
    • Business models
    • Companies
    • People
  • Regulation
  • Tax planning
  • Protection
  • Diversity
  • Events
  • Whitepapers
  • Industry blogs
  • EM and Asia spotlight
  • Newsletters
  • ESG spotlight
  • Sign in
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Professional Adviser's Working Lunches in partnership with Orbis Investments - 2019

      Join us in March for the Professional Adviser Working Lunch series in partnership with Orbis Investments.

      • Date: 05 Mar 2019
      • Knutsford, Leeds, Surrey, Bristol
      event logo
      Professional Adviser Working Lunches 2019 - Baillie Gifford & First State Investments

      Professional Adviser is delighted to announce the launch of the new Working Lunches in partnership with Baillie Gifford and First State Investments. Travelling across the UK to provide valuable market insights for Senior Financial Advisers.

      • Date: 13 Mar 2019
      • Southhampton, Worcester, Durham, Norwich, Liverpool, Exeter, Sheffield, Leicester, Nottingham
      event logo
      Professional Adviser 360 2019

      The highly anticipated Professional Adviser 360 conference is taking place on 25th April 2019 at The Brewery in London.

      • Date: 25 Apr 2019
      • The Brewery Chiswell Street London EC1Y 4SD, London
      event logo
      Fund Manager of the Year Awards 2019

      The 2019 Fund Manager of the Year returns on Thursday 27th June 2019, Grosvenor House Hotel, London. Save the date.

      • Date: 27 Jun 2019
      • Grosvenor House Hotel 86-90 Park Lane Mayfair London W1K 7TN, London
      View all events
      Follow our events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up
  • Whitepapers
    • Find whitepapers
      Search by title or subject area
      View all whitepapers
  • Sign in
  •  
    •  

      Personalise your on site experience

      Download and use the apps

      Access your subscription from outside of the office

      Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox

      Sign in
     
     
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
  • Register
  • Industry blogs
  • EM and Asia spotlight
  • ESG spotlight
Professional Adviser
Professional Adviser
  • Home
  • Multi-Asset
  • Retirement
  • Your profession
  • Regulation
  • Tax planning
  • Protection
  • Diversity
 
  •  

    Personalise your on site experience

    Download and use the apps

    Access your subscription from outside of the office

    Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox

    Sign in
 
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
Professional Adviser
  • Regulation

Name and shame: The true cost of FCA warning notices

NAME & SHAME

man-in-a-suit-with-a-briefcase
  • Carmen Reichman
  • Carmen Reichman
  • @carmenreichman
  • 29 October 2013
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

The regulator will soon start to name the businesses against which it has started disciplinary proceedings - but at what cost? Carmen Reichman investigates...

The Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) decision to name firms - and in some circumstances individuals - in public warning notices, has caused concern in the industry.

A primary concern, understandably, is of the FCA shaming the innocent before they are proven guilty.

Related articles

  • Adviser noticeboard: Post-it note size stuff for IFAs
  • Gillian Hutchison: Should you be allocating to real assets?
  • Relive the 2019 PA Awards in photographs
  • Tom Poulter: Target practices
  • Talking with … J.P. Morgan AM's Karen Ward

The FCA argues the new approach is necessary to create improved transparency. It also said it hoped the change would deter more firms from behaving badly and, at the same time, instil greater public trust in the industry.

The true cost of publishing FCA warning notices

While the FCA has admitted the new policy could create extra costs for both itself and firms concerned, it says these should be "minimal". The regulator said there would be a "minimal increase in the operating costs of the Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC) in making the additional decision whether to publish information in relation to a warning notice".

Financial concerns

However, industry specialists warned that added administration costs could be anything but small. Barrister Peter Hamilton, of 4 Pump Court chambers, said costs "will be significantly increased by the FCA's wish and desire to have the warning notice published".

He added: "These are going to be serious issues that the FCA is raising, so the firm is going to take them seriously and it's going to engage lawyers in the consultation process.

"These things don't just happen quickly or lightly, there is an awful lot of preparation involved on both sides that will increase the costs and I don't think it's reasonable to say that the costs are insignificant in relation to the regulation and supervision of that particular matter."

There were also concerns from the industry that the regulator's new policy could lead to an increase in litigation action and costs, however Hamilton said an increase in legal actions such as injunctions and libel suits is unlikely as "provided the FCA is acting in good faith it can't be sued".

Reputational damage

The real issue of cost for advisers, argued Association of Professional Financial Advisers (APFA) director general Chris Hannant, is the potential loss of business for firms that have been identified by the FCA.

He said: "The reputational damage is potentially worse than the direct pounds and pence of going through an enforcement action.

"There are costs to doing business and there are costs to regulation and they can be managed. But the reputational damage that might be done I think is a far more worrying factor because if your name is [shamed] potentially that will kill all new business or might even have a detrimental effect on existing clients."

In its cost-benefit analysis, the FCA admitted that firms could suffer a loss of business as a result of reputational damage. However, it stopped short of offering any form of compensation for those wrongly accused.

"We do not think it is appropriate to issue an apology or offer compensation; if a person wishes to complain about our actions they can make a formal complaint through our complaints scheme," it said.

The FCA offered instead to publicise notices of discontinuance in the same format as the original warning notice, as a "remedy for any harm caused" by the original publication. It also said it would only publish names of individuals after weighing up whether it was really necessary.

Hannant said he was relieved the FCA had taken some industry concerns on board before formulating its final policy.

"At this stage, we should welcome the fact that the FCA has listened, made some changes and we'll see how it works out in practice."

Did you know? Under the Financial Services Act 2012, the FCA cannot be sued for libel or damages unless it was acting "in bad faith" or unlawfully, according to the Human Rights Act 1998.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Regulation
  • FCA
  • APFA

More news

Noticeboard
  • Your profession
Adviser noticeboard: Post-it note size stuff for IFAs

Our weekly heads-up for advisers

  • 18 February 2019
L-R: Phil Horton, Rob Burnett, Luis Barreiro and Sumit Mittal
  • Investment
Rob Burnett unveils first fund from Lightman IM

Former Neptune manager

  • 18 February 2019
Three stones
  • Investment
The Value Perspective: Warren Buffett's key tenets of value investing

Three principles

  • 18 February 2019
  • Retirement
Pension scam report shines light on quality of advisers

27,000 transfers looked at

  • 18 February 2019
Greg Davies
  • Investment
Greg Davies: Should a change in market values mean a change in risk?

Consider risk capacity

  • 18 February 2019
Back to Top

Most read

SJP directed to waive client's exit fees after 'catalogue of errors'
Glasses
Three things your clients may call you about this week …
'Broken platform market' exposed by data from the lang cat
FCA
New claims rules leave advisers open to FCA sanction, warns solicitor
Handshake
Kingswood reveals first seven partners and incentive plan details
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy and Cookie policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017