IA backs European Parliament PRIIPs rejection but calls for further scrutiny

Concerns over presentation of costs and charges

Daniel Flynn
clock • 2 min read

The Investment Association (IA) has backed European Parliament's majority decision to reject the current regulatory technical standards (RTS) for the implementation of PRIIPs Key Information Documents (KIDs), but said scrutiny should extend to the directive's presentation of costs and charges.

Yesterday, the European Parliament voted 602 in favour of passing the rejection to the European Commission and Council, against four who voted against. The European Commission will now be tasked with re-drafting the RTS, which are believed to be due in October. Despite the setback, the 31 December PRIIPs implementation date still stands. Florian van Megen, retail markets specialist at the IA said the proposed rules would have led to "extremely flawed and misleading retail investor disclosure". "We agree with the overwhelming majority of the European Parliament that rejected the pro...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

Partner Insight: Beyond 60/40

Partner Insight: Beyond 60/40

Invesco
clock 25 March 2024 • 5 min read
'Fundamental shift': Why transparent investing really matters

'Fundamental shift': Why transparent investing really matters

‘There needs to be a concerted shift towards greater openness’

Simon Camilleri
clock 18 March 2024 • 4 min read
Partner Insight: Passive and active — the case for both

Partner Insight: Passive and active — the case for both

Invesco
clock 18 March 2024 • 4 min read